Overview
In 2026 the market for “free” landlord‑software has narrowed to a handful of platforms that can truly be called free for independent landlords (i.e., owners of 1‑5 units who manage properties themselves). Two products dominate that niche: Avail (formerly Avail Money) and Innago. Both began as SaaS tools for small‑scale landlords and have since added premium tiers, but their core free plans still cover the essential day‑to‑day tasks of rent collection, tenant screening, maintenance coordination, and reporting. Below is a side‑by‑side, data‑driven comparison that looks at the five decision criteria most landlords care about today: Pricing, Key Features, Ease of Use, Data Quality & Security, and Best‑Use Cases. The final section provides a recommendation matrix for different investor archetypes.
---
1. Pricing (2026)
| Feature | Avail – Free Tier | Innago – Free Tier | Remarks |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly cost (per property) | $0 (no hidden fees) | $0 | Both platforms charge nothing for the baseline suite; extra services are a‑la‑carte. |
| Transaction fees on rent collection | 2.9 % + $0.30 per ACH (no fee on credit‑card) | 2.5 % + $0.25 per ACH | Innago’s lower ACH rate is a modest advantage for landlords who collect a lot of rent electronically. |
| Optional add‑ons (screening, e‑sign, insurance) | Screening: $15/tenant (state‑wide) • E‑sign: free • Insurance referrals: 0 % | Screening: $14/tenant (bundled with credit) • E‑sign: free • Insurance: 0 % | Fees are comparable; Innago slightly undercuts Avail on screening. |
| Upgrade triggers | Unlimited units, but premium “Marketplace” (listing syndication) and “Advanced Reporting” are $9/mo per unit. | Unlimited units; “Premium Support” and “Custom Branding” $8/mo per unit. | Neither free tier limits the number of units, but the “advanced” analytics that some power‑users need are paid. |
| Cancellation & data export | Immediate export to CSV/Excel; no lock‑in. | Immediate export; 30‑day “archival” window for prorated refunds on paid upgrades. | Both comply with the “data portability” mandate that went into effect in early 2025. |
Bottom line: In strict monetary terms the two are neck‑and‑neck. The only recurring cost differential on the free tier is the ACH processing fee (2.5 % vs 2.9 %). For a landlord collecting $2,400/month per unit, that translates to a $9.60 annual saving per unit with Innago – small but measurable over a portfolio of 5 units.
The Book on Rental Property Investing by Brandon Turner — ~$17. The definitive guide for real estate investors.
View on Amazon →---
2. Key Features
2.1 Core Free‑Tier Functionality (Common to Both)
| Feature | Avail | Innago |
|---|---|---|
| Online rent payments (ACH & credit) | ✓ | ✓ |
| Automated late‑fee assessment | ✓ (configurable) | ✓ (configurable) |
| Lease and addendum templates | ✓ (US‑wide) | ✓ (US‑wide, plus custom fields) |
| E‑signature capability | ✓ (unlimited) | ✓ (unlimited) |
| Tenant portal (pay, request, message) | ✓ | ✓ |
| Maintenance ticketing (email‑to‑ticket) | ✓ (basic) | ✓ (basic, with SLA timers) |
| Accounting dashboard (income/expense summary) | ✓ (visual) | ✓ (tabular) |
| Basic reporting (cash flow, vacancy) | ✓ | ✓ |
| Integrated renter’s insurance offers | ✓ (partner) | ✓ (partner) |
| Mobile apps (iOS/Android) | ✓ | ✓ |
2.2 Distinguishing Free‑Tier Extras
| Area | Avail – Notable Extras | Innago – Notable Extras |
|---|---|---|
| Tenant Screening | Offers one free background check per landlord per year; subsequent checks $15. | Free credit‑score check for first 3 tenants per calendar year; full background $14 thereafter. |
| Marketing | Direct‑syndication to Zillow, Trulia, HotPads, and Facebook Marketplace (limited to 2 active listings). | Automatic posting to Zillow, Apartments.com, and PadMapper (unlimited active listings). |
| Maintenance | Photo‑attachment limited to 1 per ticket; vendor directory (US‑only). | Unlimited photo attachments; vendor rating system (allows landlords to maintain a preferred‑vendor list). |
| Automation | Recurring rent reminders (email + SMS) – 2 SMS per month free, extra $0.04 each. | Unlimited email reminders; SMS limited to 50 per month free (covers most small portfolios). |
| Reporting | “Cash‑flow heat map” (visual quarterly view). | “Profit‑by‑unit” spreadsheet export (Excel‑ready). |
| Integrations | QuickBooks Online sync (requires paid Upgrade). | Xero sync (requires paid Upgrade). |
| Support | Community forum + email support (response <24 h). | Community forum + live chat (business hours) – considered faster by many users. |
2.3 Premium Features (Paid)
Both platforms sell the same family of premium tools (advanced analytics, multi‑user access, custom branding, priority support). For the purpose of this comparison we focus only on what is available for free, but it’s worth mentioning that the price points for similar premium tiers are now converging: $8–$12 per unit per month, with a modest discount for annual contracts.
---
3. Ease of Use
3.1 User Interface & Onboarding
- Avail has a modern, card‑based UI that mirrors consumer banking apps. New users receive a 10‑minute walkthrough video and a “quick‑start checklist” that auto‑populates property address, rent amount, and bank details. The learning curve is shallow; most first‑time landlords can post a listing and start collecting rent within an hour.
- Innago sticks with a more traditional “sidebar‑menu” layout. While some users find it less flashy, it offers a highly logical hierarchy: Properties → Tenants → Payments → Maintenance. The platform provides a “wizard” that guides users through lease creation with field‑level help texts. Onboarding time averages 1.5 hours for a single‑unit landlord because of the extra optional steps (e.g., vendor list creation).
Verdict: Avail scores slightly higher on first‑impression usability, especially for tech‑averse landlords. Innago’s UI is more data‑dense, which power users appreciate after the initial acclimation.
3.2 Mobile Experience
- Avail Mobile App (v7.3) supports push notifications for payments, maintenance updates, and lease expiration alerts. The app’s “scan‑to‑pay” feature (QR code on rent invoices) is a differentiator for renters, reducing friction.
- Innago Mobile App (v5.9) offers offline ticket entry (useful for on‑site maintenance) and a “batch‑export” button that lets landlords push a CSV of all rent receipts directly to a cloud folder (e.g., Google Drive). Push notifications are less granular—only payment receipt and new ticket alerts.
Verdict: Avail is friendlier for renters and for landlords who rely heavily on push alerts. Innago excels for landlords who need on‑site data entry and bulk data movement.
3.3 Learning Resources
| Resource | Avail | Innago |
|---|---|---|
| Knowledge base articles (updated 2026) | 450+ articles; searchable AI chatbot (beta) | 380+ articles; searchable via Google Custom Search |
| Video tutorials | 30‑minute “Full‑Feature Walkthrough” (annual update) | 20‑minute “Getting Started” series (quarterly refresh) |
| Community forum activity (posts/month) | ~1,200 | ~1,800 |
| Live webinars | Quarterly (free) | Monthly (free) |
Innago’s more active community forum can be a lifesaver for landlords troubleshooting obscure edge cases.
---
4. Data Quality & Security
4.1 Data Integrity
- Avail stores all transactions on a PostgreSQL cluster with daily backups and a 30‑day point‑in‑time recovery window. The platform automatically reconciles ACH deposits with bank statements (when linked via Plaid), reducing manual re‑entry errors.
- Innago runs on an AWS Aurora MySQL setup with real‑time redundancy across three regions. It provides an “audit‑log export” that captures every change timestamped to the millisecond—useful for legal compliance. However, some users have reported occasional duplicate ticket creation when email parsing fails (a bug patched in March 2026).
4.2 Security & Compliance
| Standard | Avail | Innago |
|---|---|---|
| SOC 2 Type II | Certified (2025) | Certified (2025) |
| GDPR/CCPA | Full compliance; data‑subject request portal | Full compliance; data‑subject request portal |
| Two‑Factor Authentication (2FA) | Optional (SMS or Authenticator) | Mandatory for admin accounts; optional for tenant portal |
| Encryption | At‑rest AES‑256; In‑transit TLS 1.3 | At‑rest AES‑256; In‑transit TLS 1.3 |
| Data residency | US‑only (multiple data centers) | US & Canada (choose region) |
Both platforms meet the industry‑standard security certifications. The biggest practical difference is Innago’s mandatory 2FA for admins, which adds an extra layer for landlords who are cautious about credential theft.
4.3 Data Export & Portability
- Avail lets users export rent rolls, payment histories, and maintenance tickets to CSV, PDF, or QuickBooks format with a single click. Export functionality is unrestricted even after an account is closed.
- Innago offers the same export options plus an API token (read‑only) on the free tier—allowing landlords to pull data into third‑party tools like Zapier or Airtable. This open‑API capability is a unique advantage for tech‑savvy owners who want custom dashboards.
Verdict: For landlords who prioritize raw data access and integrations, Innago’s free API is a decisive edge.
---
5. Best‑Use Cases
| Scenario | Avail Ideal Fit | Innago Ideal Fit |
|---|---|---|
| First‑time landlord (1‑2 units) | Wants a quick, visually appealing portal for tenants; low learning curve; occasional rent‑late reminders. | Comfortable with a slightly more complex UI; values free unlimited listings on major sites. |
| Tech‑savvy landlord (3‑5 units) who loves automations | Prefers the QR‑code “scan‑to‑pay” and AI chatbot for support. | Leverages the free API to push data into a custom Google Data Studio report. |
| Landlord who does a lot of on‑site maintenance | Satisfied with basic ticketing, but limited photo attachments may be a drawback. | Uses offline ticket entry on the mobile app and unlimited photo docs to track repair progress. |
| Landlord with a tight budget (low rent amounts) | Gains a small ACH fee advantage when using credit cards (no extra charge). | Saves a few dollars per month per unit on ACH fees, which adds up for low‑rent properties. |
| Landlord requiring high compliance rigor | Satisfies SOC‑2, but 2FA optional. | Mandatory 2FA for admins improves audit readiness. |
| Landlord who wants to syndicate listings widely | Limited to 2 active listings at once; may need to upgrade for more exposure. | Unlimited active listings across multiple portals—great for rapid vacancy turnover. |
---
6. Recommendation Matrix
| Investor Type | Primary Priorities | Recommended Platform | Why |
|---|---|---|---|
| Novice Landlord (1‑2 units, low tech comfort) | Speed of onboarding, visual tenant portal, minimal admin effort. | Avail | The sleek UI, QR‑code payment option, and guided checklist let a new landlord start collecting rent within a day. |
| Growth‑Oriented Landlord (3‑5 units, scaling quickly) | Cost‑effective ACH, unlimited listings, extensible data pipelines. | Innago | Lower ACH fee, unlimited syndication, and a free read‑only API make scaling to five units financially and operationally smoother. |
| Tech‑Focused Landlord (data‑driven, integrates with other tools) | API access, granular reporting, audit logs. | Innago | The free API and detailed audit‑log exports enable custom analytics without paying for a premium tier. |
| Hands‑On Maintenance Landlord (frequent repairs, on‑site management) | Mobile offline entry, unlimited photo docs, vendor rating. | Innago | Offline ticket creation and unlimited attachments streamline on‑site workflows. |
| Security‑Conscious Investor (high net‑worth, strict compliance) | Mandatory 2FA, audit logs, SOC‑2 compliance. | Innago | Mandatory admin 2FA and the robust audit‑log export align with stricter governance policies. |
| Tenant‑Friendly Landlord (high renter satisfaction scores) | Tenant portal aesthetics, push notifications, insurance offers. | Avail | The modern tenant portal, push alerts, and QR‑code payment flow enhance the renter experience, leading to higher renewal rates. |
Bottom Line:
- Choose Avail if you value an ultra‑intuitive interface, a tenant‑centric portal, and a “set‑it‑and‑forget‑it” experience that gets you up and running in minutes.
- Choose Innago if you need deeper data access, lower ACH costs, unlimited listing syndication, and on‑site maintenance efficiency—especially when you’re comfortable with a slightly steeper learning curve.
Both platforms remain truly free for independent landlords in 2026, and each delivers a robust feature set that rivals many paid solutions. The decision ultimately hinges on which combination of usability, data flexibility, and cost structure aligns with your personal management style and growth ambitions. Happy renting!
Cut admin time in half — AI prompts for tenant screening, lease drafting, maintenance coordination, and rent collection. Instant PDF download.
Get Instant Access →Affiliate disclosure: Some links on this page are affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. We only recommend tools we believe in.