Introduction
Real‑estate‑debt crowdfunding has matured dramatically since its early‑stage days, and by 2026 the market is dominated by a handful of platforms that combine sophisticated technology, tighter regulatory frameworks, and robust secondary‑market liquidity. Two of the most widely‑used portals—Groundfloor and PeerStreet—continue to lead the U.S. residential‑mortgage and multifamily‑bridge loan space, but they have diverged in strategy, pricing structure, and the investor experience they provide. This comparison breaks down the latest offerings (as of Q2 2026) across five dimensions—pricing, key features, ease of use, data quality, and best‑use cases—and then maps each platform to the investor profiles that will benefit most.
---
Platform Overviews
| Groundfloor | PeerStreet | |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2013 – originally a “first‑time homebuyer” lender, now a pure marketplace for short‑term (6‑12 mo) real‑estate debt. | 2014 – started with multifamily bridge loans; today covers residential fix‑and‑flip, new‑construction, and commercial bridge debt. |
| Regulatory status | SEC‑registered broker‑dealer; only accredited investors can access the full marketplace, but a Retail Credit Investor tier (minimum $1,000) was opened in 2024 under Regulation A+. | SEC‑registered broker‑dealer; offers both accredited‑only and Retail tiers (minimum $5,000) under Regulation A+. |
| Assets under management (AUM) | ≈ $1.2 bn (2025 year‑end) – 70 % of loan pool is residential fix‑and‑flip, 30 % multifamily bridge. | ≈ $2.3 bn – 55 % residential fix‑and‑flip, 35 % multifamily/condo, 10 % commercial (industrial, office). |
| Typical loan size | $50k‑$250k (average $115k). | $100k‑$500k (average $215k). |
| Average yield (net of fees) | 8.3 % (2025) | 9.1 % (2025) |
Both platforms now host AI‑driven underwriting dashboards, real‑time secondary‑market order books, and integrated tax‑benefit calculators (e.g., for QOF and 1031‑exchange investors). The differences lie in the granularity of loan selection, fee structures, and the overall investor experience.
The Book on Flipping Houses by J Scott — ~$17. The definitive guide for real estate investors.
View on Amazon →---
Pricing
| Component | Groundfloor | PeerStreet |
|---|---|---|
| Origination fee (charged to borrowers) | 2.5 % – 3.0 % (tiered by loan size) – fully passed to investors as a discount on the loan price. | 2.0 % – 2.7 % (tiered) – also reflected as a discount; occasional “promo‑origination” drops to 1.5 % for repeat borrowers. |
| Platform fee (charged to investors) | 0 % on primary purchases. A 0.25 % annual servicing fee is applied on the outstanding principal for loans held beyond 30 days. | 0 % on primary purchases. 0.35 % annual servicing fee on outstanding balance, waived for investors who hold an average of ≥3 loans. |
| Secondary‑market transaction fee | Flat $15 per trade (minimum) + 0.15 % of trade value; discounted to $5 for “Elite” investors (≥$250k cumulative investment). | 0.20 % of trade value (minimum $10) – no flat fee, but a 0.05 % “liquidity surcharge” for trades executed within 24 h of listing. |
| Account‑maintenance / inactivity | No annual account fee; a $20 monthly “inactivity surcharge” applies if no trades are made for 6 months. | No account fee; $10 monthly inactivity fee after 12 months of zero activity (rarely triggered for active investors). |
| Tax‑document services | Free automated 1099‑INT/1099‑OID generation; optional $49 “Tax‑Optimizer” add‑on that integrates with TurboTax & QuickBooks. | Free standard tax forms; premium $79 “Tax‑Pro” suite adds automatic 1031‑exchange routing and state‑tax breakdowns. |
Bottom line: PeerStreet’s overall fee load is marginally higher, especially for secondary‑market trading, but the platform offers fee waivers for high‑volume investors. Groundfloor’s fee schedule is simpler and cheaper for occasional investors, but the $15 flat trade charge can bite when moving small positions.
---
Key Features
| Feature | Groundfloor | PeerStreet |
|---|---|---|
| Deal‑screening granularity | 4‑point “Deal Score” (Location, Sponsor Experience, Loan‑to‑Cost, Exit Strategy) with real‑time GIS heat‑maps for zip‑code performance. | 7‑point “Risk Rating” (Sponsor, Property Type, Market Cycle, Loan‑to‑Value, Debt Service Coverage, Exit Timing, Environmental) plus dynamic “Deal Radar” that flags emerging markets. |
| AI underwriting | “GroundAI” – a neural‑network model trained on 10 yr of loan performance; provides a probability of default (PD) and loss‑given‑default (LGD) estimate that investors can filter on. | “PeerPredict” – similar model but also ingests macro‑economic sentiment (unemployment, construction permits) to adjust expected cash‑flow timelines. |
| Secondary market | Integrated order‑book with instant settlement (T+0); fractional trades down to 1 % of a loan (minimum $250). | Order‑book with T+1 settlement; fractional trades to 5 % (minimum $1,000). PeerStreet’s market depth is larger, especially for high‑yield multifamily loans. |
| Tax‑advantaged structures | Supports Qualified Opportunity Fund (QOF) investments via partner portals; automatic “deferred‑gain” reporting. | Dedicated 1031‑exchange workflow with real‑time “exchange‑eligible” tags; partnership with major 1031‑exchange firms. |
| Mobile app | iOS/Android app launched 2024; full loan browsing, trade execution, and push notifications for deal updates. | Mobile app (2023) – limited to portfolio view; trade execution still web‑only (desktop‑optimized). |
| Investor education | “Ground Academy” – 30‑minute video modules, live quarterly webinars with sponsor panels, and a community forum. | “Peer University” – deeper curriculum (10‑module series) with certification; access to deeper data sets after certification. |
| Automation | “Auto‑Invest” – rule‑based engine (e.g., “auto‑allocate 10 % of cash to 8‑10 % PD loans in Dallas”). | “Smart‑Portfolio” – pre‑set risk‑budget allocations (Conservative, Balanced, Aggressive) with automatic rebalancing on the secondary market. |
Both platforms now offer real‑time performance dashboards and API access for sophisticated investors to pull loan‑level data into their own portfolio‑management tools.
---
Ease of Use
Groundfloor scores high on simplicity. The onboarding flow is a three‑step process: verify identity, fund the account, set investment preferences. The interface is clean, and the Deal Score visualizations let a newcomer quickly gauge risk. The mobile app is fully functional, enabling investors to browse, fund, and trade on the go. The Auto‑Invest wizard is particularly appealing for hands‑off investors.
PeerStreet offers greater depth, which can feel overwhelming for a beginner. The platform presents a wealth of data tables, risk‑rating vectors, and macro‑filters that require a learning curve. However, for experienced investors the Smart‑Portfolio tool and the robust secondary market provide efficient ways to maintain target allocations without daily manual screening. The lack of full mobile trading is a minor friction point, though the desktop site is responsive and the company is piloting a “mobile‑first” trade pane for elite users in late 2026.
Overall, Groundfloor is the more intuitive option for the casual or first‑time investor, while PeerStreet rewards users who are comfortable navigating richer data sets.
---
Data Quality
Both platforms have invested heavily in data pipelines, but subtle differences matter:
- Source verification – Groundfloor contracts directly with national lender networks and runs a proprietary title‑chain audit for every loan. PeerStreet partners with major regional banks and provides a third‑party underwriting audit (by Moody’s Analytics) on a quarterly basis.
- Granular performance metrics – PeerStreet publishes monthly cash‑flow waterfalls and a “Loan Health Index” that integrates property‑level rent roll updates, whereas Groundfloor reports quarterly snapshots but uses AI‑estimated cash‑flow forecasts to fill gaps.
- Historical win‑rate – PeerStreet’s loan pool historically exhibits a 3.8 % default rate (2022‑2025) with a loss severity of 45 %, while Groundfloor’s default rate sits at 4.2 %, but with a lower loss severity of 38 % thanks to tighter underwriting on residential flips.
- Transparency of fees – PeerStreet’s fee breakdown is posted per loan in the prospectus, while Groundfloor includes a single “discount rate” figure, making it harder to isolate borrower‑side fees.
For a data‑driven investor, PeerStreet edges ahead due to richer, more frequently refreshed loan‑level data, but Groundfloor’s consolidated AI outputs make it easier to interpret for those who prefer a “single‑score” view.
---
Best Use Cases
| Scenario | Groundfloor | PeerStreet |
|---|---|---|
| Retail investor seeking low minimums | Ideal – $1,000 minimum, $250 fractional trade, simple UI. | Acceptable – $5,000 minimum, higher fractional trade size. |
| Accredited investor looking for diversified multifamily bridge exposure | Limited – only 30 % of inventory is multifamily; loan sizes may be too small. | Strong – large pool of $200k‑$500k multifamily loans; depth for diversification. |
| Investor focused on tax‑advantaged strategies (QOF, 1031) | QOF‑ready deals, automatic deferral reporting. | Dedicated 1031‑exchange workflow, faster compliance. |
| Hands‑off robo‑style portfolio | Auto‑Invest rules very customizable, but no “risk‑budget” rebalancing. | Smart‑Portfolio automatically rebalances using secondary‑market trades, perfect for set‑and‑forget strategies. |
| High‑frequency secondary‑market trader | T+0 settlement and low minimum trade size enables nimble repositioning. | Larger market depth and better liquidity for bigger positions; T+1 is a slight lag but offset by breadth. |
| Risk‑averse investor prioritizing capital preservation | Lower loss severity (38 %) and tighter loan‑to‑cost caps on residential flips. | Slightly higher yields but higher default risk; better for those willing to accept a modest risk premium. |
---
Recommendations by Investor Type
1. First‑Time / Retail Investor
Goal: Learn the space, keep capital modest, prioritize simplicity. Recommendation: Groundfloor. The $1,000 entry point, mobile‑first design, and auto‑invest wizard make it the most approachable platform for newcomers. The QOF‑compatible loans also give a tax‑advantage pathway without the complexity of a 1031 exchange.
2. Accredited “Growth‑Oriented” Investor
Goal: Capture higher yields, diversify across property types, and manage a larger capital base. Recommendation: PeerStreet. The broader loan universe—including high‑yield multifamily and commercial bridge loans—combined with the Smart‑Portfolio automation delivers a scalable, high‑return profile. The richer data set helps assess risk at a granular level.
3. Passive Income / Income‑Focused Investor
Goal: Steady cash flow, low turnover, tax‑efficient income. Recommendation: PeerStreet if you need commercial/ multifamily exposure and want to leverage the 1031‑exchange workflow for defer‑tax income. For a pure residential‑flip focus with less turnover, Groundfloor’s fractional secondary market lets you rebalance without major capital moves.
4. Institutional / Family‑Office Allocation
Goal: Large ticket sizes, customized reporting, and secondary‑market liquidity for rebalancing. Recommendation: PeerStreet. The platform’s higher average loan size, deeper secondary market, and Moody’s‑backed underwriting audits align with institutional due‑diligence standards. PeerStreet also offers API‑direct access for order execution and portfolio analytics, which Groundfloor currently limits to accredited users only.
5. Tax‑Strategic Investor (Opportunity Zones, 1031 Exchanges)
Goal: Maximize tax deferral or deferral of capital gains. Recommendation: Groundfloor for QOF‑eligible projects (their partnership with Opportunity Fund managers is robust), PeerStreet for 1031‑eligible bridge loans. Many sophisticated investors actually use both platforms to blend QOF exposure with 1031‑exchange opportunities, switching based on the timing of their capital events.
---
Conclusion
In 2026 Groundfloor and PeerStreet both deliver sophisticated, AI‑enhanced real‑estate‑debt crowdfunding, yet they occupy distinct niches within the ecosystem. Groundfloor shines on accessibility, low entry thresholds, and a frictionless mobile experience, making it the go‑to for newer and tax‑advantaged retail investors. PeerStreet excels in data depth, loan size, and automation for high‑net‑worth or institutional investors looking for diversified multifamily and commercial bridge exposure and the ability to execute strategic secondary‑market trades.
When selecting a platform, match the core attributes to your investment objectives:
- If you value simplicity, low minimums, and a clean mobile experience → Groundfloor.
- If you demand richer data, larger loan sizes, and advanced automation for a high‑allocation portfolio → PeerStreet.
Most seasoned investors will find value in maintaining accounts on both platforms, using Groundfloor for quick, low‑minimum experiments and tax‑advantaged QOF deals, while allocating the bulk of capital to PeerStreet for diversified, higher‑yield bridge loans and a more sophisticated secondary‑market strategy. This hybrid approach leverages the strengths of each platform and positions you to capitalize on the continued growth and liquidity improvements that the real‑estate‑debt crowdfunding market is expected to deliver through the remainder of the decade.
Cut admin time in half — AI prompts for tenant screening, lease drafting, maintenance coordination, and rent collection. Instant PDF download.
Get Instant Access →Affiliate disclosure: Some links on this page are affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. We only recommend tools we believe in.